Butterfly Ballots Flustered Floridians

People usually don’t care much about documents until they become a problem. And there is a big problem with the butterfly ballots in Florida. It was apparent to me the moment I saw the ballot on
CNN.

In my experience as a document professional, one truism is evident. The way people fill out forms is habitual. We tend to do things the way we’ve done them before over and over again. It’s as
easy as A-B-C and as simple as 1-2-3. You fill in your name, check the box, and sign at the bottom.

The critical mistake that the ballot designers made in Florida was to move away from this habitual human pattern. Document professionals understand this inherent psychology of the document. Trouble
is, the folks supervising elections for Palm Beach County are politicians, not document design professionals. By putting candidate “number two” on the right and candidate “number three” where
candidate number two should be, the Florida election politicos upset the natural form-filling flow.

As a result, voters became confused and either voted twice or punched the chad for the wrong guy. And now we have furious throngs of Floridians complaining that they voted in error. Ballot
designers failed to consider that voters would simply skim the ballot and mark their choice without really reading the document. My bet is that most people did not pay attention to the little
arrows and didn’t even attend to the names on the right hand side of the ballot.

The design of the butterfly ballot may have seemed “obvious” to the well-intentioned folks in Florida, but clearly, not everyone understood the design. The result: those now famous 19 thousand
invalid votes. Various bureaucrats likely thought the two-column format was great, but alas, the butterfly ballot has sparked tremendous controversy and concern, if not a genuine electoral crisis.

The fate of the nation may now depend on a form – a simple election ballot. Had proper forms analysis been performed, ballot designers would have found that Florida law stipulates that voters
‘place an X to the right’ of the candidate of their choice. Debate about the law aside, I am amazed that a document intended for use by thousands of diverse people wasn’t tested first. A quick
sampling of fifty mock votes at the local senior center would have certainly exposed the confusing design.

The argument that voters have been using butterfly ballots for years without any problem does not hold water. There have been problems, as evidenced by the fact that a similar percentage of Florida
ballots were rejected in past elections for the same reasons found this time around. The difference is that this time the rejected votes actually mean something. Unlike in years past, in this
historic dead-heat, every vote counts. Document professionals have long known that there is more to forms design than simply placing words and boxes on paper. Now the entire country is beginning to
clue in. The selection of our president might well come down to a matter of poor document design.

Share this post

Kevin Craine

Kevin Craine

Kevin Craine is a professional writer, technology analyst, and award-winning podcast producer. He was named the #1 Enterprise Content Management Influencer to follow on Twitter and has listeners and readers worldwide. Kevin creates strategic content for the web, marketing, social media, and more. He is the written voice for many of the world's leading brands. His client list includes many well-known global leaders. In addition, he is a content strategist for AIIM International. Kevin's podcasts have been heard around the world, and his interviews feature today's best thought leaders; including the award-winning weekly business show "Everyday MBA". He is also the host and producer of "Bizcast"​ on C-Suite Radio and the producer behind podcasts for Forbes, AIIM International, Tripwire, and others. His newest podcast, The Digital Transformation Podcast, was named a Top 5 Podcast for Digital Transformation. Prior to starting Craine Communications Group, Kevin was Director of Document Services for Regence BlueCross BlueShield where he managed high volume document processing operations in Seattle, Portland and Salt Lake City. He also spent time at IKON as an Enterprise Content Management consultant working with national and major accounts. He was the founding editor of Document Strategy magazine. Kevin has also been, at one point or another, an adjunct university professor, a black belt martial artist, and a professional guitarist. Kevin holds an MBA in the Management of Science and Technology as well as a BA in Communications and Marketing.

scroll to top