|
Digging up Dollars: Data Mining in Practice – April 2009
If Only I Knew...
Published: April 1, 2009 The goal of this article is to describe a process to translate the wish for customer knowledge into actionable strategies and tactics.
If only I knew…
– who will renew their service plan – who will defect to the competition – who will buy our new product – who will become a high-value customer Sound familiar? To make better decisions as business people, we all wish we could see into the future and deep into the hearts and minds of our customers. In response to the wishes above, this article asks the question, “Suppose I knew _______, what would I do?” We will describe the process to translate the wish for customer knowledge into actionable strategies and tactics. We will look specifically at one common business problem, customer retention, but the same principles will apply to a broad range of business issues. The primary instruments involved will be a customer database/warehouse and a predictive model built via data mining. By the time you are finished reading, you will understand the wish-to-action translation process from end to end. And you will be able to apply the process to your own business problem(s) – before any money is spent or any project is begun. To keep the discussion concrete, we will consider the process in the context of a case study. Suppose that Donna is the VP of Marketing for a large trade organization.1 She is responsible for several trade shows and a large annual meeting. Over time, there has been a decrease in attendance at the annual meeting. She needs to increase retention. Donna asks, “Suppose I knew who will come to this year’s meeting, what would I do?” We will continue Donna’s exercise of imagination by:
Mapping the Territory
![]() Such models have technical labels like predictive models, likelihood models, or scoring models. The names are actually quite descriptive for the current discussion. For Donna, a typical likelihood model will produce a score, for example, from 0 to 100, indicating how likely an individual is to attend this year’s meeting. The larger the score is, the more likely the outcome is. One individual might score high because they have attended for many years and they are in the “Baby Boomer” age group. Another individual might have attended just once, resulting in a lower score. Conceptually, Donna’s prior attendees are shown ranked from low to high in Figure 1. Each dot or mark represents a prior attendee, and we can see that some are highly likely to attend this year, while others are much less so. At this point, it is tempting to think that this is a sufficient (conceptual) map of the customer landscape. Others have jumped into data mining efforts with even less reflection than this. Why not jump ahead? Simply put, not all attendees or customers are created equal. To realize the full benefit of data mining for increasing revenue, reducing cost, and/or improving ROI, we need some notion of customer value. Then the territory map will be truly actionable. ![]() Different attendees at the annual meeting certainly have different values to Donna’s company. Some register for the full, multi-day meeting. Others attend only for a single day. Certain attendees belong to sponsor organizations, those who pay for promotional considerations. Some are exhibitors who pay for booth space to display their products and talk with existing and potential customers. Others have intrinsic value to the meeting, such as speakers or volunteers. The variations of value go on and on. In general, a second predictive model is necessary to estimate the likely value of a customer for this year’s meeting. For simplicity of discussion, however, we will use a simple estimate of attendee value. The estimate will be the average of their attendance values at previous meetings, ignoring any intrinsic worth for now. Adding this new value dimension to the likelihood score, we produce the final map of the territory, shown in Figure 2. As before, each mark on the map is a prior attendee. Notice that many different combinations of likelihood and value are present. Some prior attendees are high value and highly likely to attend. Others are high value but less likely to attend, and so on. The picture has become slightly more complex, but it needs to be to make good decisions. Segmenting the TerritoryHaving assigned a likelihood of attendance and a likely value to each prior attendee, we have addressed the first half of Donna’s question. Now, we move forward to consider the second half, “What would I do?” For marketing and many other business functions, it is common not to work with the precise estimates for likelihood and value for each customer. Rather, it often makes sense to group individuals into segments or clusters with similar attributes of likelihood and value. Donna can define marketing strategies and tactics that fit the common characteristics of the segment, rather than try to customize to each unique individual. ![]() Segmenting the territory into more or fewer than four segments is not unusual. The choice for the number of segments can be driven by any natural clustering that is evident. Or, the choice can depend on the need to keep the number of segments at a manageable level. For Donna’s purposes, the four segments illustrated in Figure 3 will suffice.
Designing Strategies and TacticsNow, Donna can get creative. With four segments defined, she can think strategically about how she wants to develop the attendees in each segment. Refer to Figure 4 to visualize the discussion
that follows. For instance, strategically, Donna wants to keep the “Sweet Spot” (HH) attendees where they are. To achieve that goal, she considers tactics like a loyalty/rewards program
or special opportunities to meet with thought leaders at the annual meeting. |