|
Data Stewardship Performance Measurement
Published: July 1, 2004
Published in TDAN.com July 2004
IntroductionEnterprises that are implementing data management best practices and data management programs often struggle while developing performance metrics for the new (or renewed) discipline and function. Data Stewardship performance metrics have become the focus of many of these enterprises as they look for ways to demonstrate the value and success of the improved discipline and accountability for the management of enterprise data. This article is focused on briefly identifying different types of measures that an enterprise may consider when developing their data stewardship programs and measuring the success of their data management programs. The ability to implement metrics for a data stewardship program often depends on two primary factors – 1) The enterprise’s willingness to consider permanent (longer-term) value alongside the immediate measurable benefits of the programs and 2) The enterprise’s ability to attribute the improvements in information-based capabilities to the action of the stewardship program. The second factor (for the purposes of this article known as Attribution Analysis) is not the focus of the data stewardship performance measurements described in this article. Please note that Attribution Analysis plays a vital role in the ability to relate improvements of quantifiable permanent value in information-based capability to the activities of the data management program and specifically the data stewardship program. For a well-written paper on attribution analysis as it relates to performance measurement please visit: Addressing Attribution Through Contribution Analysis: Using Performance Measurement Sensibly. Note: I gratefully acknowledge Ed Levine for pointing me to this resource. One of the critical success factors for improved information-based capabilities is the standardization and consistent use of data across the enterprise. This long-term value of the consistency in enterprise data will only be achieved through incremental improvements in data standardization, a process that must be guided by individuals that know the business and the data – namely the Data Stewards. In my experience, data steward roles are strongly aligned with the deployment of enterprise data standards that will lead to the improved information-based capabilities. A quick review of data steward roles from an earlier article I wrote called A Simplified Approach to Stewardship:
Enterprise data management functions often measure the performance of the Data Stewardship program using two primary methods – Through the use of 1) Business Value Measures (longer-term) and 2) Acceptability & Compliance Measures (immediately measurable). Business Value MeasuresBusiness Value Measures directly attribute business value to the implementation of the data stewardship program, data standardization and improved data management discipline. In the private sector, business value is most often measured by increases of revenue and profitability, reduction of cost and improvements in productivity. In the public sector only some of these types of business value measures are relevant, while others may require customization for not-for-profit businesses. For many enterprises, information-based capability improvements are the long-term business value goals of the data management function. Sample statements and measures in terms of quantifiable business value include:
In order to meet these measurable objectives, the enterprise must adopt enterprise data standards for “enterprise” data. As stated earlier, the individuals that know the data (the data stewards) will guide the adoption of these standards. The Acceptability & Compliance Measures will be used to measure the adoption of the enterprise data standards. The business value measures listed here are only samples of how standardization of data through the implementation of the data administration discipline and the data stewardship program can result in new business capability and value. The ability to quantify these types of business measures will depend on the enterprise’s ability to associate improved business decision making, increases in revenue/income, reduction in costs, improvements in productivity, etc. to these improved information-based capabilities. Acceptability & Compliance MeasuresThe second type of data stewardship performance measurements are called Acceptability & Compliance Measures which are ways to directly evaluate and measure the level of adoption of enterprise data standards and the data stewardship program. Sample measures in terms of quantifiable acceptability and compliance:
Rolling out new technology and integrated data applications alone won't standardize data. The enterprise must adapt its culture and involve the department-areas and key stakeholders in data definition, production, and usage. Technology alone will not solve the standardization issue. A strong commitment to enterprise standardization of data and recognition of the impact standards have on improved information-based capabilities will allow the enterprise to successfully measure the business value of data stewardship stated earlier in this document. Measurement Critical Success FactorsThere are two factors critical to measuring the success of the data management function and the data stewardship program:
This article focused on identifying different types of metrics and measures that an enterprise may consider when developing their data stewardship programs and measuring the success of their data management programs. For more information on how to build & implement a data stewardship program, please visit http://www.kikconsulting.com. Copyright © 2004 Robert S. Seiner - All Rights Reserved Go to Current Issue | Go to Issue Archive Recent articles by Robert S. Seiner
Robert S. Seiner - Robert (Bob) S. Seiner is recognized as the publisher of The Data Administration Newsletter, LLC – www.TDAN.com - an award winning electronic publication that
focuses on sharing information about data, information, content and knowledge management disciplines. Mr. Seiner speaks often at major data management and meta-data management, business
intelligence and knowledge management related conferences and user group meetings across the U.S. He can be reached at the newsletter at rseiner@tdan.com or
412-220-9643.
Mr. Seiner is the President and Principal Consultant of KIK Consulting & Educational Services, LLC – www.KIKconsulting.com. KIK, celebrating its 5th anniversary, is a company that focuses on knowledge transfer and consultative mentoring in the fields of data governance and data stewardship implementations, metadata management, master data management and data architecture. Beyond knowledge-transfer-focused consulting, Mr. Seiner offers two-day in-house and public courses on how to build and implement data governance / stewardship programs and metadata programs. Contact Mr. Seiner at KIK at rseiner@kikconsulting.com. |